Compare
Solar Design Lab vsAutoCAD + In-House Team
If you're producing plansets in-house with AutoCAD, you've chosen control. That control is real. But so is the cost. AutoCAD wasn't built for solar, so every planset requires manual drafting, every NEC cycle requires template rebuilds, and every drafter you lose costs months of onboarding.
What AutoCAD + In-House Team does well
- Full control over timelines and process
- No dependency on outside firms
- Custom workflows tailored to your team
Where it starts to break
As volume goes up, the workflow becomes the bottleneck.
Today's loop
Designredrawreviseredrawsendrevise
- 8-15 hours per residential planset; SLD alone takes 2-3 hours without plugins (per industry sources)
- Software cost is $1,865/yr per AutoCAD seat after the 2025 Autodesk price hike. Realistic stack with PVComplete + PVsyst lands at $5,000+/yr
- NEC cycle drift: every code update means rebuilding label libraries, SLD blocks, and plan notes across every template (NEC 2023 changed label colors, moved DC voltage labels, consolidated power source directory)
- Tough jurisdictions like HVHZ Florida force separate template trees per AHJ. And most rejections come from drafter-level errors (title block omissions, wrong NEC reference, missing EGC path), not engineering
- Hiring solar drafters is a 3-6 month onboarding for non-CAD hires; turnover hits when you least expect it
The real limitation
You're paying for capacity even when no work is moving through it. And traditional CAD wasn't built for solar.
A different approach
Solar Design Lab gives you both. Design it yourself, or hire a vetted PE. Same tool.
- Replaces drafting with a tool built for solar. Drag-and-drop, NEC-aware, AHJ-aware
- Replaces external engineering coordination with a vetted PE network in the same app
- Variable cost per planset, not fixed-cost capacity sitting idle
- NEC drift handled centrally. Your label package, plan notes, and code references update with the platform
- Tough jurisdictions like HVHZ Florida handled by real PE engineering, not template branching
The same workspace whether you design it yourself or hand it to a vetted PE on the network.
Screenshot pending
The workflow shift
One step does the same job, or fewer.
AutoCAD + In-House Team
Designredrawreviseredrawsendrevise
Solar Design Lab
Designupdatestampfile
You don't need more drafting power or more drafters. You need less manual work and a platform that absorbs NEC drift for you.
Try it on your next planset. No card required.